| The Fluoroquinolone
Toxicity Research Foundation
|
You are visitor number
|
|
|
Vision Research | See downloads for: Adobe Files |
|
|
|
|
|
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:378-384. Fluoroquinolone Effective In Treating Corneal Ulcer But Should Be Used With Caution May 4, 2000 WESTPORT (Reuters Health) - Fluoroquinolone drops and combined fortified antibiotics are equally effective in treating bacterial corneal ulcer. However, although fluoroquinolone therapy is shorter, it leads to more serious complications and should be used with caution, particularly in the elderly, Australian researchers report in the April issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology. Dr. Mark Daniell and colleagues, from the University of Melbourne, reviewed the medical records of 138 patients with bacterial corneal ulcer. Of these, 54 were treated with fluoroquinolone and 84 were treated with tobramycin 1.3% plus cefazolin 5%. The two therapies were equally effective in treating the condition in terms of visual outcome, the researchers found. However, serious complications such as corneal perforation, evisceration, or enucleation of the affected eye occurred in 16.7% of patients receiving fluoroquinolone, compared with only 2.4% of patients receiving fortified antibiotic therapy. The authors estimated that patients taking fluoroquinolone had an 8.9-fold increased risk of serious complications. Compared with fortified antibiotics, in patients over 60 years of age, fluoroquinolone therapy significantly reduced the length of intensive therapy, from 6 days to 4 days, and significantly reduced median hospital stay, from 10 days to 7 days. Dr. Daniell's group suggests that this could result from "quicker clinical response of healing as a result of less toxicity found in the patients treated with fluoroquinolone." Corneal perforation may have been the result of coexisting ocular pathologies, or fluoroquinolone may have altered the tectonic strength of the cornea, the authors write. In elderly patients with deep ulcers, they recommend that "use of combined fortified antibiotics rather than fluoroquinolones could be considered in cases at higher risk of perforation." Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:378-384. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|