PRIMARY CARE OPTOMETRY NEWS 1/1/04
Generations apart: Making sense of the new fluoroquinolones
The next generation of ophthalmic fluoroquinolones is here. But for
now there may be more questions about them than answers.
Lauren Wolkoff
Editor,
Once again we read such an article devoid of any warnings regarding
the severe and crippling adverse reactions associated with
fluoroquinolone therapy. One would think that they are yet another
harmless "antibiotic". I assure that they are anything but. They are a
dangerous and toxic chemotherapeutic agent with severe, crippling and
non-abating adverse reactions associated with their use. Numerous
fatalities have been reported as well. Severe vision damage including
loss of vision, complete shutdown of the tear producing glands, cornea
and retina damage, manifestation of map dot dystrophy and permanent
diplopia have all been reported as to being associated with such
therapy. I also speak from experience having been blinded by the
careless use of these drugs. Having received treatment from both Dr.
Rowsey at St. Lukes Cataract and Surgery Center and Dr. Updegraff at
Updegraff Vision here in the Florida, (the two leading vision centers
in the state) I have been informed that my conditions are not
treatable and irreversible. I invite you to log unto
www.fqresearch.org and read the 4000 plus entries that document all
that I state here.
*********************************************************************
I am also the webmaster of an adverse drug reaction forum and the
following is what the patients who have suffered such damage have to
say:
I took Cipro september 2001. Immediately I saw black spots passing
constantly in front of my range of vision. At first I though they were
bugs flying about, but only I could see them. In addition to the black
spots floating about, I have had flashing lights at the outside range
of vision for a year and a half.(sic)
I want to know if someone who took cipro or an other quinolone had
floaters in the eyes after it and is floaters desappear gradually,
because i have it for 3 month now and it seem to be less dark and
bigger. I dont thing that is related with the age because im only 25
yrs! I saw an ophtalmologist an he said that my vision is good and i
only have some floaters in the vitreous. Is floaters can be related
with some deposits in the vitreous of the eyes because i see this in
the RX information of Ciprofloxaxin (After oral administration
ciprofloxacin is widely distributed throughout the body. Tissue
concentrations often exceed serum concentrations in both men and
women, particularly in genital tissue including the prostate.
Ciprofloxacin is present in active form in the saliva, nasal and
bronchial secretions, sputum, skin blister fluid, lymph, peritoneal
fluid, bile and prostatic secretions. Ciprofloxacin has also been
detected in lung, skin, fat, muscle, cartilage, and bone. The drug
diffuses into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); however, CSF
concentrations are generally less than 10% of peak serum
concentrations. Low levels of the drug have been detected in the
aqueous and vitreous humors of the eye.). Is floaters can be seen if
you have an irritation of the retina or something like that? If this
floaters caused by deposits of cipro, is this reversible? I want to
know if someone had is floaters desappeared with time to give us some
hope! (sic)
I think your opthalmologist has misdiagnosed your condition. Many on
this formum have complained of vision problems including the
appearance of what seems like floaters in their field of vision. (sic)
I just finished seven days of Tequin, prescribed for pneumonia. When I
took the first pill I did not shut my eyes for almost 2 days. My lips
were tingling and my heart was racing. I thought all this was due to
breathing treatments, steroid shot, and steroid pills. I never
imagined that the "antibotic" was the problem. I continued to have
these problems and then some blurred vision, ringing in ears and pain
between my shoulder blades (sic)
Those who continue to have vision problems and their doctors continue
to claim "It cannot be the drug" may find the following to be of
interest:
"A small number of patients receiving fluoroquinolones developed
visual disturbances including color distortion and diplopia (Ball,
1989). "(sic)
"From the Levaquin monograph:
In clinical trials using multiple-dose therapy, ophthalmologic
abnormalities, including cataracts and multiple punctate lenticular
opacities, have been noted in patients undergoing treatment with other
quinolones"
"From the Cipro monograph:
May cause ophthalmologic abnormalities, Retinal degeneration "
"From the RAXARâ„¢ Glaxo Wellcome Grepafloxacin HCl Antibacterial
momograph:
Special Senses: amblyopia, conjunctivitis, deafness, dry eyes, ear
disorder,
eye pain, lacrimation disorder, parosmia, photophobia, taste loss,
tinnitus. "
From the Floxacin Monograph:
Adverse Reactions:
The following adverse reactions have been reported in association with
use of ofloxacin.
itching, foreign body sensation, photophobia, blurred vision,
hyperaemia, chemical conjunctivitis/keratitis, periocular/facial
oedema, dry eyes, eye pain (1-5% of treated eyes) and dizziness. These
symptoms led to cessation of treatment in 1.6% of patients. "(sic)
This past July, I was given Levaquin once again. The first day taking
it, I felt so weak and dizzy, that I could barely walk. I then had
burning,pins and needles in my feet and hands which was worse than
anything I had before. i was itchy, so I called my doc and asked if I
should discontinue the levaquin. Nurse said "NO"> I asked her to check
with him again, and she said he felt I should keep taking it or else
the infection that they were checking me for
could worsen and the results could be "detrimental". (sic)
I continued to take the med, and by day 5 I couldn't walk or hold a
glass of water by myself. I had pain and burning in every muscle of my
body. It even hurt to move my eyes around the room.
(sic)
My left eye felt like it was moving and jerking, but not insync with
the right eye.By now, I convinced myself I had MS or a brain tumor.On
Day 4, the Gastroenterologist took me off the Cipro and gave me
Colestid for the diarrhea. By the 5th day, I thought I was going to
die. Started having sunburn sensation on legs, arms and back. Got a
red, measle-like rash that burned and itched??? (Cold compresses
seemed to help and made the redness subside some.) Since it was the
week-end, I got the on-call doctor who said it was good I stopped the
Cipro and prescribed Valtrex for the rash (thinking it was shingles).
She said that the muscle and eye
problems could be due to dehydration (since I wasn't really eating or
drinking much.)(sic)
I like you had an ADR from taking Levaquin for a sinus infection. I
too had a lot of the same symptoms that you described. My left eye
pupil was always more dilated then the right and it felt like my eyes
were reacting in slow motion at times. Symptom after symptom would
changed and shifted or moved around as time went on another one who
thought she had MS here. scariest time of my life. I had visual
problems as well with a whacky neuro test on my right eye. my MRI was
normal. No MS. I believe my eyesight has recovered. the burning and
rash are VERY typical of quinolones (sic)
The absolute WORST thing, though, is the 'jerky' eye. It makes it hard
to read and do most anything else.(sic)
I have been having problems with my eyes ever since taking cipro for a
urinary problem. I took cipro 500 mg twice a day for about 6 - 8
weeks, a total of 1000 mg per day. I have floaters and spots in my
vision. I have not been on the medication for several months but the
problems still persist. Has anyone else had similar issues? (sic)
After mabey a month since i stop the cipro i started to have a little
spot in the corner of my right eye and after in my left one. Now i
have it for about a month and a half but i have about 2 or 3 spots in
each eye, some its like a circle and some is like a piece of hair. But
now, i ting that my spots dissolve because at first its was little and
dark and now its bigger but less dark. I see an ophtalmologist and he
said that everything is ok..i only have floaters(sic)
My adverse reaction to Avelox started out with a pain like no other in
the right side of my face, involving the eye. It felt as if someone
had a pair of pliers pulling at the back of my eye and the pain spred
under my eye (felt like it was in the bone structure) down to the
right side of my neck. I would go to bed crying,(which made the pain
worse! for days!) thinking that this pain would eventually make me go
stark raving mad. At times I understood Dr. Kavorkian! (sic)
I was diagnosed with 'Posterior Vitreous Detachment' in my right eye.
Does this sound familiar to anyone? (sic)
I had exactly the same thing happen after taking Cipro. The Cipro was
in January (second round, first was in the previous December.) and the
eye problem began the middle of Feb. Still have clouding and debris in
that eye. (sic)
I find it interesting because my mother who took Cipro for about 3
months for osteomyelitis last year now has several new eye problems.
One of which is the beginnings of macular degeneration. I'd have to
check with her what all the other problems are but, I think she has
something similar to what Winnie was talking about, the vitreous
detachment.(sic)
I was diagnosed with cataracts the year following levaquin and now
four years later with macular degeneration, and was wondering if
anyone else has been.(sic)
I wish I could recall exactly how long it took for my eyes to get
better-- actually it was predominantly one eye. You really need to
have an opthamologist look it over rather than simply an
optometrist/optician. I also had abnormal nerve movement in the eye as
measured by an EEG. (You watch a TV screen and the electrodes record
the nerve tracking of the visual image).
(sic)
It's so strange, but as I look back for many many years, I have ALWAYS
said that while and after taking an antibiotic, I had trouble with my
eyes. Now, of course after being floxed and ciproed to death 6 years
ago, I am really having trouble with my eyes. I go to an opth. Monday,
the 20th to see why I have "narrow angles"!!!Another thing to add to
my laundry list!!! (sic)
Just a note about eye symptoms. The first week I took Levaquin, I woke
up with one eye totally dry and pink. I thought I had an eye infection
but, it did resolve itself. Now my eyes may look red and veiny but,
usually if I've slept poorly and I do have environment allergies. BUT,
it was one of my initial reactions to the Levaquin.(sic)
I also had a sudden vitreous detachment in one eye immediately after
taking a 10 day course of Cipro. This was among the other reactions,
(sic)
Sorry to hear about how messed up your eyes are. I just completed my
visit to an opthamologist(SP) for my vision problem in my left eye.
(sic)
I mentioned this happened after taking Levaquin and thought it was a
possible reason for my eye sight problems.. He said there are many
drugs that can mess with the eyes, and Levaquin sure can be one of
them..(sic)
Basically I have 20/40 vision in my left eye now, and 20/20 in my
right.. No damage was noticed when he looked at my eye.. he told me it
isnt that bad vision wise and see him in a couple years for another
checkup..Well I guess good news for me for once :)... Anyway I hope
you will one day be able to take those triple bifocals off and heal
from this mess muscle wise..
(sic)
My eye doctor was not familiar with the ADR's to FQ's, however he
listened intently and examined my eyes very carefully. He also told me
that whenever anyone has, for example, Lasik surgery, the antibiotics
used are likely to be FQ's: Ocuflox and Cipro. Something to keep in
mind if anyone is considering that. (sic)
He said that as far as my actual vision goes, it's doing ok. I don't
need to change my prescription. However the double vision and blurred
vision I've been having, he thinks is because my eyes are not behaving
in as flexible and coordinated a manner as they should be. I had
problems with tracking an object and with getting my eyes to focus
together. (sic)
I took 3 Cipro on July 9th, and have mostly been on the mend. But I've
noticed short-term memory and word-recall problems lately.Does anyone
have any insights on whether this could be from the Cipro, at this
point in time, or just part of normal aging or whatever (I am 48, and
for the most part, sharp as a tack). Also yesterday I had a short
period of time where my vision got blurry for no apparent reason. (I
called the eye doctor on that one, and have an appointment for next
week.(sic)
Last Friday, I noticed a flash of light on the side of my right eye.
It has continued to flash and some floaters are ocurring now that
disturb my vision. Made an appt. with a opthamologist this morning for
1:45 PM today. Just got back a short time ago. He diagnosed me with
"posterior vitreous base detachment". He said my retina looked
alright, but if I had an increase in floaters or saw a veil (a sign of
a detached retina) to call him right away. He said it should improve
on its own and be much better in two weeks. I pray that is what will
happen.(sic)
Whether Levaquin caused this or not, I don't know. But, I mentioned my
ADR to the doctor and asked if it could have contributed to it and he
did not say no or yes. (sic)
I too had a problem with flashes of light in the corner of my eyes
after taking Avelox. It cleared up after five weeks, but has left me
with floaters. I know this is alarming, but even if your retina does
detach, there is surgery now that will help you as long as you get to
the Dr right away if you see the "showers". I am not trying to make
light of this situation, as I well know how terrifying it can be,(sic)
Following my Levaquin adverse reaction approx. two years ago, I have
had tinnitus and eye floaters. Has anyone out there suffer similar
symptoms and have them abate after two years? Is this damage
permanent? If anyone has experience with the aforementioned symptoms
or their associated treatments, I would greatly appreciate your
comments (sic)
About a year ago (time flies) I posted an article - written in awkward
English from a foreign eye surgeon - who stated that during an
operation they scrapped off white stuff and found it was pure Cipro
inside the eye - they had it tested it was the pure chemical which had
condensed in the eye. (sic)
BALTIMORE Because of its lower pH, ciprofloxacin seems to form drug
depots at the site of a break in the cornea, such as in a surgical
corneal flap or the bed of a corneal ulcer, said Richard A. Eiferman,
MD, clinical professor of ophthalmology in Louisville, Ky.
"We originally thought that was very bad and would impair wound
healing," he said. "When we looked at the data we found that it did
not impair wound healing. We looked at all our corneal ulcers and
found that they healed the same length of time whether they had a
precipitate or they didn't have a precipitate." One patient's corneal
ulcer allowed Dr. Eiferman to study the drug depot more thoroughly.
The ulcer caused the corneal tissue to melt, prompting a transplant to
prevent perforation. The eye had been pretreated with ciprofloxacin,
which had formed a precipitate in the ulcer bed. "I took the plaque
out and I put it on a plate of bacteria and had a nice zone of
inhibition," Dr. Eiferman said. "When we took it out a day later and
put it in another plate of bacteria, it was still active." A
laboratory analysis at Alcon Surgical sampled the precipitate and
determined that it was pure fluoroquinolone, he added. "It had been my
belief that this happens in every single corneal ulcer, but only in a
few patients does it precipitate out so much that you can see it," he
said. Dr. Eiferman is now analyzing four corneal transplants for
ciprofloxacin deposits and intends to present his results at the
meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in October. "In the
two studies that were done, the two drugs appear to be equivalent,"
Dr. Eiferman said. "My gut feeling is that Ciloxan may be better if it
is sticking around in the ulcer bed." (sic)
Are depots effective?Discrete deposits of quinolones might not take
advantage of the quinolonesââ‚â„¢ mechanism of action, said Terrence
P. Brien,MD, in practice at the Wilmer Eye Institute in Baltimore and
member of the Cornea/External Disease section of the Ocular Surgery
News Editorial Board. "In general, it makes sense that a solution is
better because if the drug is in solution it can penetrate to get to
the site where the infection is going on," he said. "If you're talking
about a corneal infection, it is in the stroma where the bacteria are
replicating. If you have drug out on the surface, drug that's
precipitated away from the active site, potentially it is not
effective." Any study of the precipitate needs to examine whether the
precipitated drug
is dissolving again into the tissue where it can have its antibiotic
effect, he said. "Until that's proven we have to be careful saying
that precipitates are a good thing." (sic)
Corneal precipitates found to be ciprofloxacin deposits
This seems to indicate that Flouroquinolones pool in areas of our
bodies. The eye is the only place where this can be seen in clumps of
pure chemical. It might explain why people report that they get better
and then they get worse, the pure chemical might be breaking up over
time and aggravating the intial ADR. (sic)
I remember reading that Levaquin keeps killing bacteria long after it
is supposedly excreated through the kidney. This, residue in the eye,
seems to show that the drugs never fully left, they may have just
penetrated different tissues and stayed there. I just woke up about 20
minutes ago and I paid close attention to my sight. I am unable to see
just about everything when I first wake up, everything is so
blurry/cloudy, it seems to rake some time for my eyes to focus enough
to even look at pictures taped to the wall in front of my desk with
the PC on it. Then I have no choice but to put on my reading glasses
for at least an hour to focus on the words on the PC.
(sic)
This just doesn't seem normal. And I still don't buy that an
individual goes from wearing glasses for hours of reading/tired eyes
(college text studying, ya'll know what I mean, the long hours it
takes to read chapters of a boring text, college or not, but required
reading) then to wake up one a.m. not able to see any reading material
(on the third day of Tequin) remember I shared with ya'll that I kept
telling my body felt like it was soaking in an acid pit, wonder if the
excess acid fried my eyes or my Brain, grin. (sic)
Based on my experience with the ADR to Levaquin, it takes at least 3
years to be able to live/perform a near normal life! (sic)
Even after 3 years, symptoms still exist, ie., numb toes, pain in
ankles, burning (eyes, mouth, skin), visual problems, passing pain in
back of hands and lower arms, and at times - imbalance in walking, My
left eyelid is droopy also and my right eyelid tight. My left pupil is
dilated and everything is a bit fuzzier than usual. My eyes are
strained when looking at the computer screen too long. I have problems
with bright lights, everything seems too bright. I also have a twitch
in my left eye. I think I need some tests to see what damage has been
done.(sic)
For the past four months since taking my last Tequin, my left eyelid
has been drooping...My eyes don't look the same. My vision has been
"dimmer" (need more lights turned on in the house), eyes get tired
more easily, as well has continuing to have no strength in my hands
(and joint pain in the hands and fingers). I recognized the joint pain
and weakness as Tequin (sic)
I would like everyone who has had blind spots develop in their eyes
since taking fluoroquinolones to email me and tell me about them. On
New Year's Eve I noticed a small area in the vision of my right eye
was blind. As I read a small portion of the word above the one I was
reading would turn white like the paper I was reading. On Wednesday,
January 2, I saw my opthamologist who referred me to a retina
specialist. The retina specialist was sure I had an autoimmune disease
because this type of vision loss is usually associated with either
arthersclerosis (older people) or retinal vasculitis (younger people).
The results of the fluorescien photos of both eyes revealed nothing.
He could not find an occlusion or inflamation, even at the sight of
the loss. (sic)
Today I went through all the blood tests, etc. to completely rule out
any autoimmune disease and specifically vasculitis. (sic)
I still have the vision loss. It has not changed in these 11 days. I
am curious whether anyone else has had this. (sic)
Of interest is that my initial reaction and only time I have taken a
fluoroquinolone was in October 2000. I still cycle with muscle fatigue
and pain every few months. Twitching has become a small part of my
life. (sic)
My field of vision would be white, as if I had looked into the sun too
long and could not clear my eyes Has anyone experienced the same eye
problems my wife is currently dealing with, namely nausea and
dizziness whenever she finishes reading something or while watching
t.v.? With the t.v. it seems to me like her eyes are telling her brain
that she is moving even though she is perfectly still at the time.
This then causes her to have motion sickness. I'm not a doctor but I
just don't understand it any other way. (sic)
I have an increased number of floaters. I also have something like a
dark sheer curtain effect that I see only when I move my eyes side to
side while looking at a white surface or the sky. But the most
troubling thing I have is a blind spot which occurred sometime around
New Year's Eve. I noticed it while reading in bed. My left eye was
covered by the pillow and I noticed a spot just above the centeral
part of my vision was blanking out part of the letters. Somehow the
blood flow to that small part of my retina was cut off for a short
period of time. I have a "permanent" loss of sight there. I have had
many appts with a retinal specialist and my internal medicine doctor
to rule out what normally causes this.(sic)
The first symptoms I had right after taking Cipro were vision related.
My eyes became very dry, and I saw flashes of light when I moved my
eyeballs from side to side or up and down. The Opthamologist said that
I had a "vitreous detachment". I also had large "floaters" in one eye
that he said were cells torn off from the retina and optic nerve.
Three years later, I still have this big gob of stuff in my eye that
is like looking thru waxed paper, and it is especially difficult to
see when the light is shining into that eye. My eyes are no longer
dry, that lasted only about a month,and I also had droopy eyelids at
the time too. It was also difficult to focus and make my eyes work
together. All of those symptoms are gone, and I am left with the stuff
in one eye, which gets no better (sic)
My eyes were tired and didn't focus well for quite some months after
Cipro/Levaquin/naldixic acid/Floxin/Tequin - all in a 6 or 7 month
period. In addition, I had eyelid problems - one eye twitched for over
a month, and one eyelid drooped severely suddenly and the other
drooped a little. The last problem has not resolved itself over two
years later. (sic)
I did develop vision problems and had to get new glasses. I also fell
and broke my arm nearly two years later because my depth of field is
really screwed up and I misjudged the height of a curb.Anyway, I aged
20 years in two years after Levaquin. (sic)
. My blurry vision has stabilized to a degree I can see things a bit
more clearly, however my eyes are not as reactive to light - I need
more light to see things clearly. (sic)
I've been having a very bad twitch in my left eye and the pupil is
continuously dilated. It seems every day brings a new problem. The
left eye looks completely different from the right one, the eyelids
don't match. Has anyone had eye problems? Do you have any info on what
is happening that causes the twitch and dilation? (sic)
My eyesight was never good but now it's also a bit fuzzy.To refresh my
history: I took 5 250 mg Levaquin pills (the last pill was taken on
5/29). This eye problem is one of many that I'm suffering. (sic)
Her other pronounced symptom is that she cannot stand any bright light
and she has "pain behind her eyeballs". Friday the eye doctor gave her
very dark glasses. Tomorrow she will have a series of eye exams. (The
doctor did not want to do them Friday because of everything that had
happened that week.) The doctor wants to know if this is a common
reaction or a rare reaction, and if anyone has any insights into this
reaction. Any information I can give her would be helpful to her.
(sic)
For what it's worth, I went through two bouts of light sensitivity
after being FQd. The first lasted weeks and happened a couple of
months after the FQs. The second was another couple of months later,
was not as intense and lasted about a week. No recurrences in the last
three months. (Since being FQd I was light sensitive in months 3-5 and
again at month 7. I am just finishing month 11.)(sic)
I too had problems with double vision. One on the many of my long
list. I had the same treatment as you. My eyes are still not 100%
normal as they are very sensitive to the light and my visual acuity is
not what it was before being "floxed". Just thought I would let you
know that you are not alone! (sic)
I have also had ongoing vision poblems, Rick describes them well but i
never had a problem with bright light. I can see better in sunshine:
it is fluorescent light, probably because of the pulsing, that drives
me crazy. It is my right eye, and it has been that way off and on
since April 1999 when I first took Levaquin. It gets better and then
descends again unexpectedly. It is very distressing since my office is
nothing but fluorescent lights. (sic)
Shortly after finishing a 9-day course of Levaquin, I developed double
vision (diplopia). I had to take Methylprednisilone for 6 days. The
neuro-opthalmologist says I have inflamed eye muscles, and possibly
inflamed optic nerve (sic)
I have visual disturbances also, when I went to the ophthalmologist he
told me that my eye sight was normal. This is the only thing that he
found: "The peripheral retinal presented patches of white without
pressure with glistening deposits at 2:00 o'clock and an apparent flap
was questionable. Another patch of white without pressure was seen at
6:30. There was a radial glistening dots on it was seen at 6:30. There
was a radial fold at 1:15 clockwise. A small patch of schisis-like
with glistening dots on it was seen at 6:30 in the peripheral retina.
A patch of white without pressure was visible at the lower temporal
quadrant. " At the end of the report it says." He was also warned on
increasing flashing lights and floaters and if present to seek eyecare
right away." This doctor told me that he wanted to do lazer surgery on
the white spots that he found, as a preventitive, but he specifically
mentioned floters or flashing lights ( lightening bolts) as possibly
signaling a problem.(sic)
The visual changes in me were a BIG increase in floaters (which are
sloughed cells in the aqueous), a change in vison acquity, and
increased sensitivity to light. (sic)
when I go to Wal-Mart my eyes burn and I have this kind of spaced out
feeling and am really anxious to get out of there.(sic)
I was floxed over 18 months ago (Floxin), and have not been the same
since in many ways. Since that time, I've worn glasses a lot, but I
notice that when I do try to wear contacts now, I get pain in the eye
within hours. Also a red spot shows up right next to my pupil (in
either eye, and on the inside toward the nose). The next day, I cannot
bear to wear them. I know the lenses are clean b/c they are one-day
throw-aways. (sic)
Prior to this I wore contacts for 12 or 13 years without problem. I
read on here that quinolones can show up in the "aqeuous humor of the
eye"? Could this be what I'm experiencing? If someone has had this,
what did you do about it? (sic)
I have had wierd visual problems like lots of floaters, and seeing
things just wierd. Colors are too colorful? And black is too black?
Strange. Has anyone actually found anything wrong with their eyes from
their eye exams? (sic)
Cheri would be one of at least three people posting here who have had
visual problems after being FQ'd. (sic)
I suffer from periodic attacks of silver shimmering spots in my visual
field, combined on two occasions (for a couple of weeks each) with
intense photosensitivity. Another report here included permanent (I
believe) blind spots caused by shimmering areas. I don't have blind
spots, I just have trouble seeing clearly. (sic)
In my case, I had my last photo-sensitivity episode around Christmas,
and the shimmering is currently pretty good. (sic)
For what it's worth, my shimmering problem is clearly worse under
fluorescent lights, and better in the sunshine.(sic)
My ophthalmologist (don't you hate trying to spell that) suggested
that I might be having migraine visual auras without the headaches.
That sounds fine to me, except that I never had them until about a
month after I was FQ'd.(sic)
I call it "blurry vision" but that is really not a good description.
My eye problem has three components. First, I become sensitive to
light. I have trouble driving at night because headlights hurt my
eyes. As you would expect, this is most noticeable at night. Second,
there is a kind of shimmering brightness in the vision of my left eye.
This has only happened twice, once around July 4 when my light
sensitivity was the worst, and again this week. It's pretty scary.
Third, I can feel my left eye. It isn't really pain, it's more like
mild irritation. This gets worse and better, but it hasn't really gone
away since I was FQ'd. This week it's very distinct. (sic)
Despite these problems, the vision in my left eye is only slightly
worse than it was. In the summer of 1998 my correction in my left eye
was about -3.75 and now it's about -4.00. My opthalmologist says that
a quarter diopter is not a big change in a year, and is well within
normal changes. Someone else who has posted here mentioned that she
had been forced to get new optical prescriptions frequently (every
month? every three months?) because her vision was deteriorating. This
does not seem to be the case with me.(sic)
A short time after I was "floxed", I felt a strange sensation in my
left eye too. I would be walking say down an aisle in the supermarket
and I felt like my peripheral(?) vision was gone. I went to the opth.
and he couldn't find anything wrong. I never mentioned the floxin to
him because at that time I didn't know all I know now. My overall
vision is terrible, yet when my eyes are checked, my reading glasses
don't need to be changed. Everything is always blurry to me. (sic)
I posted early on in my Levaquin saga that my vision has been
affected.I suddenly needed a new prescription shorty after I was FQ'd,
then needed another change, this time a weaker prescription, 2 months
later. I to had the floaters so thick they looked like cobwebs, now
they are just little specks every so often. Mine to were said to be
cause of my age. Never had them before the Fq's and they came on right
after taking them. Streets lights and lights from cars really bother
me I won't drive at night. (sic)
I only wore glasses to read before now I have to wear glasses for
distant. Also my brain and my eyes don;t work well together, sounds
weird but the only way I know how to explain it. I still have blurry
vision and sometimes the ground is wavy. I also saw colors, long blue
lines. I hate to write this it sounds so crazy. but it is the truth
(sic)
I had asked the pharminfo net Dr about the quinolones He said that the
FQ's could affect any organ.Would be interesting if some of you would
go on the site and ask about the FQ's. Although they deny any long
term affect. (sic)
I also suffer from visual disturbances similar to yours. You mentioned
a shimmering brightness in the vision of your left eye but that it has
only happened twice. I have three "blind" shimmering spots in the
vision of my left eye that the opthamologist believes are the result
of severe nerve irritation possibly caused by the two Levaquin tabs I
took. However, these shimmering spots do not come and go; they have
been there since the day I took the second tablet (March 20, 1999). I
have also noticed a large area of occasional blurriness in the same
eye that does come and go. I avoid driving at night if possible
because I just don't feel that I can "see" as well as I did pre-FQ.
(sic)
[all of the above are to be found within the indiviual post archived
on the quinolone adverse drug reaction forum hosted by Yahoo.]
**********************************************************************
You may also find the following references to be of interest as well:
A small number of patients receiving fluoroquinolones developed visual
disturbances including color distortion and diplopia (Ball, 1989).
(sic)
Levaquin monograph
In clinical trials using multiple-dose therapy, ophthalmologic
abnormalities, including cataracts and multiple punctate lenticular
opacities, have been noted in patients undergoing treatment with other
quinolones (sic)
Cipro monograph
May cause ophthalmologic abnormalities
Retinal degeneration (sic)
Floxacin Adverse Reactions:
The following adverse reactions have been reported in association with
use of ofloxacin.
itching, foreign body sensation, photophobia, blurred vision,
hyperaemia, chemical conjunctivitis/keratitis, periocular/facial
oedema, dry eyes, eye pain (1-5% of treated eyes) and dizziness. These
symptoms led to cessation of treatment in 1.6% of patients. (sic)
Effects of antibiotics on morphologic characteristics and migration of
canine corneal epithelial cells in tissue culture.
Hendrix DV, Ward DA, Barnhill MA.
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary
Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine effects of commonly used ophthalmic
antibiotics on cellular morphologic characteristics and migration of
canine corneal epithelium in cell culture. SAMPLE POPULATION: Corneal
epithelial cells harvested from corneas of 12 euthanatized dogs and
propagated in cell culture. PROCEDURE: Cells were treated with various
antibiotics after a defect was created in the monolayer. Cellular
morphologic characteristics and closure of the defect were compared
between antibiotic-treated and control cells. RESULTS: Cells treated
with ciprofloxacin and cefazolin had the greatest degree of rounding,
shrinkage, and detachment from plates. Cells treated with neomycin-polymyxin
B-gramicidin and gentamicin sulfate had rounding and shrinkage but
with less detachment. Cells treated with tobramycin and
chloramphenicol grew similarly to control cells. On the basis of
comparisons of defect circumference between control cells and cells
exposed to antibiotics, tobramycin affected cellular migration the
least. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Effects of ciprofloxacin
and cefazolin on morphologic characteristics of canine corneal
epithelial cells in vitro should be taken into consideration before
using these antibiotics for first-line of treatment for noninfected
ulcers. Of the antibiotics tested that have a primarily gram-negative
spectrum of coverage, gentamicin inhibited corneal epithelial cell
migration and had greater cytopathologic effects than tobramycin did.
For antibiotics with a gram-positive coverage, chloramphenicol had no
cytopathologic effects on cells in comparison to cefazolin, which
caused most of the cells to shrink and detach from the plate.
Polymyxin B-neomycin-gramicidin was midrange in its effects on
cellular morphologic characteristics and migration. (sic)
Corneal ulcer associated with deposits of norfloxacin.
Konishi M, Yamada M, Mashima Y.
Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine,
Tokyo, Japan.
PURPOSE: To report a case of corneal ulcer associated with deposits of
norfloxacin. METHOD: Case report. A 40-year-old man with right
trigeminal and facial nerve palsies and decreased tear secretion
developed a corneal ulcer with white deposits in the right eye. The
deposits were removed and analyzed by high-performance liquid
chromatography. RESULTS: High-performance liquid chromatography
results disclosed that the deposits on the corneal surface had the
same retention time as norfloxacin. The patient discontinued
norfloxacin ophthalmic solution and recovered successfully.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that frequent applications of
topical norfloxacin in patients with decreased tear secretion may
result in deposition of the drug on the cornea.(sic)
Ciprofloxacin microprecipitates and macroprecipitates in the human
corneal epithelium.
Eiferman RA, Snyder JP, Nordquist RE.
Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville,
Kentucky, USA. reiferman@cs.com
In 4 corneal transplantation patients treated preoperatively with
ciprofloxacin ophthalmic drops, microprecipitates associated with
damaged corneal epithelium were noted in 2 patients. Another patient
developed a large macroprecipitate in a corneal ulcer. All specimens
were examined by electron microscopy and high-pressure liquid
chromatography. The crystalline precipitates were pure ciprofloxacin.
The macroprecipitate demonstrated a large zone of inhibition on agar
plates seeded with a susceptible organism at 24 and 48 hours. It was
bioactive and bioavailable in vitro. (sic)
"...received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
to
market its Vigamox antibiotic solution (moxifloxacin 0.5%) for the
treatment
of bacterial conjunctivitis. "(sic)
"In four studies, 336 pediatric patients and 392 adults had no safety
concerns or adverse events that were significantly different from
placebo.
Silver LH, Burkey R, Montgomery D, Gower L, Dickerson J, Crenshaw K,
Potts S,
Gross R, Schlech B. Safety of ophthalmic moxifloxacin in the treatment
of
newborns, infants and toddlers, children and adolescents with
bacterial
conjunctivitis. ARVO 2003; Abstract 804"(sic)
"no safety concerns", yet when we look at Ofloxacin (another
ophthalmic
fluoroquinolone) we find the following:
"ADVERSE REACTIONS
Ophthalmic Use
The most frequently reported drug-related adverse reaction was
transient ocular burning or discomfort. Other reported reactions
include stinging, redness, itching, chemical
conjunctivitis/keratitis, periocular/facial edema, foreign body
sensation, photophobia, blurred vision, tearing, dryness, and eye
pain. Rare reports of dizziness have been received." (sic)
Yet Silver et al claims that there were "no safety concerns or adverse
events
that were significantly different from placebo". I am sure that a one
year old child had
no problem bringing all of the above to Silvers attention once they
manifested.
"Dr. Mark Daniell and colleagues, from the University of Melbourne,
reviewed
the medical records of 138 patients with bacterial corneal ulcer. Of
these,
54 were treated with fluoroquinolone and 84 were treated with
tobramycin
1.3% plus cefazolin 5%.
The two therapies were equally effective in treating the condition in
terms
of visual outcome, the researchers found. However, serious
complications
such as corneal perforation, evisceration, or enucleation of the
affected
eye occurred in 16.7% of patients receiving fluoroquinolone, compared
with
only 2.4% of patients receiving fortified antibiotic therapy. The
authors
estimated that patients taking fluoroquinolone had an 8.9-fold
increased
risk of serious complications." (sic)
Now who is lying here? Daniell or Silver?
Based upon Dr. Daniell's research one would then assume that 16.7% of
these
kids are taking a substantial risk with none of the benefits. What
makes them think that this product will be any different from
levofloxacin, ofloxacin, or any other fluoroquinolone?
Levofloxacin ophthalmic solution is an antibiotic used to treat eye
infections.
Tell your doctor if any of these symptoms are severe or do not go
away:
vision problems (e.g. blurry vision)
fever
burning eyes
eye pain
light sensitivity
sensation of a foreign body in the eye
headache
dry eyes
swelling eye lids
sore throat
If you experience any of the following symptoms, call your doctor
immediately:
skin rash
itching
hives
difficulty breathing or swallowing
swelling of the face or throat (sic)
But of course it cannot be the drugs, Silver et al says they have "no
safety concerns or adverse events that were significantly different
from placebo". Yet Dr. Daniell's research contradicts these
statements.
Enrofloxacin-associated retinal degeneration in cats.
Gelatt KN, van der Woerdt A, Ketring KL, Andrew SE, Brooks DE, Biros
DJ, Denis HM, Cutler TJ.
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary
Medicine, Box 100126, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gelattk@mail.vetmed.ufl.edu
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the possible
relationship between the administration of parenteral and/or oral
[corrected] enrofloxacin and the onset of acute retinal degeneration
in cats. The animals studied included 17 cats that received systemic
enrofloxacin and developed retinal degeneration soon thereafter.
PROCEDURES: In this retrospective clinical study, cats that received
parenteral and/or oral [corrected] enrofloxacin and developed acute
blindness were identified. Parameters recorded included breed, age,
sex, enrofloxacin dosage (daily dose and number of days administered),
medical condition for which the antibiotic had been prescribed,
ophthalmic signs, examination results, and the visual outcome. Fundus
photographs were obtained in seven cats, and electroretinography was
performed in five cats. Histopathology was performed on two eyes from
one cat (case 1) that received enrofloxacin 5 months previously and
developed retinal degeneration. RESULTS: All cats were the domestic
shorthair breed; seven were females (one neutered) and ten were males
(seven castrated). Ages ranged from 3 to 16 years old (mean +/- SD;
8.8 +/- 4.6 years). The medical disorders for which enrofloxacin was
administered ranged from lymphoma and pancreatitis to otitis and
dermatitis, and eight cats had urinary diseases. The daily and total
dosage of enrofloxacin and number of days of administration were also
highly variable. Presenting clinical signs were most often mydriasis
and acute blindness. All cats had diffuse retinal degeneration as
evidenced by increased tapetal reflectivity and retinal vascular
attenuation. Absence of recordable electroretinographic responses
suggested diffuse and extensive outer retinal disease. Vision returned
in a few cats, but the retinal degeneration persisted or even
progressed. Histopathology of two eyes revealed primarily outer
retinal degeneration, with diffuse loss of the outer nuclear and
photoreceptor layers, and hypertrophy and proliferation of the retinal
pigment epithelium. CONCLUSION: Parenteral and/or oral [corrected]
enrofloxacin is potentially retinotoxic in some cats, and may result
in acute and diffuse retinal degeneration. Blindness often results,
but some cats may regain vision. Practitioners should adhere closely
to the manufacturer's current enrofloxacin dosage recommendation (5
mg/kg q 24 h), and continue clinical observations for this drug
toxicity in cats.(sic)
PMID: 11422990 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Ophthalmotoxicity and ototoxicity of the new quinolone antibacterial
agent levofloxacin in Long Evans rats.
Nomura M, Yamada M, Yamamura H, Kajimura T, Takayama S.
Drug Safety Research Center, Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo,
Japan.
An ophthalomo- and ototoxicity study of a new quinolone antibacterial
agent, (-)-(S)-9-fluoro-2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-10-(4-methyl-1-
piperazinyl)-7-oxo-7H-pyrido[1,2,3-de] [1,4]benzoxazine-6-carboxylic
acid hemihydrate (levofloxacin, DR-3355, CAS 100986-85-4) was
investigated in Long Evans rats. The rats were orally administered 100
mg/kg of DR-3355, ciprofloxacin (CPFX), norfloxacin (NFLX) or
nalidixic acid (NA) for 2 weeks, and the effects on visual and
auditory functions were examined. Examination of electroretinograms (ERGs)
revealed a decrease in the amplitudes of the a- and b-waves, a
prolongation of the latency and diminution or disappearance of
oscillatory potential waves in NA treated rats. Similar but milder
changes were also noted in the NFLX treated rats. ERGs from DR-3355 or
CPFX treated rats were normal. Histopathological examination revealed
no changes suggestive of ophthalmotoxicity or ototoxicity in the rats
treated with DR-3355, CPFX or NFLX. On the other hand, NA treated rats
showed partial loss of the outer hair cells of the organ of Corti in
the cochlea, suggesting that NA had slight ototoxicity. DR-3355 did
not show any deleterious visual or auditory effects at the dose used
in this study.(sic)
From the drug monograph for ciprofloxacin (Cipro):
Special Senses: Blurred vision, disturbed vision (change in color
perception, overbrightness of lights), decreased visual acuity,
diplopia, eye pain, tinnitus, hearing loss, bad taste.(sic)
From the monograph for ofloxacin (Floxin)
The most frequently reported drug-related adverse reaction was
transient ocular burning or discomfort. Other reported reactions
include stinging, redness, itching, chemical conjunctivitis/keratitis,
periocular/facial edema, foreign body sensation, pHotopHobia, blurred
vision, tearing, dryness, and eye pain. Rare reports of dizziness have
been received.
In clinical trials, the following events, regardless of relationship
to drug, occurred in 1 to 3% of patients: Abdominal pain and cramps,
chest pain, decreased appetite, dry mouth, dysgeusia, fatigue,
flatulence, gastrointestinal distress, nervousness, pHaryngitis,
pruritus, fever, rash, sleep disorders, somnolence, trunk pain,
vaginal discharge, visual disturbances, and constipation.
Special Senses: diplopia, nystagmus, blurred vision, disturbances of:
taste, smell, hearing and equilibrium, usually reversible following
discontinuation.
In clinical trials using multiple-dose therapy, opHthalmologic
abnormalities, including cataracts and multiple punctate lenticular
opacities, have been noted in patients undergoing treatment with other
quinolones. The relationship of the drugs to these events is not
presently established.
CRYSTALLURIA and CYLINDRURIA HAVE BEEN REPORTED with other
quinolones.(sic)
From the monograph for levofloxacin (Levaquin):
Events occurring at a frequency lower than 0.3% regardless of drug
relationship but considered medically important include: abnormal
coordination, abnormal dreaming, abnormal hepatic function, abnormal
platelets, abnormal renal function, abnormal vision, acute renal
failure, aggravated diabetes mellitus, aggressive reaction, anemia,
angina pectoris, ARDS, arrhythmia, arthritis, asthma, bradycardia,
cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular disorder, circulatory failure, coma,
confusion, convulsions (seizures), coronary thrombosis, delirium,
depression, diplopia, embolism-blood clot, emotionally lability,
erythema nodosum, G.I. hemorrhage, granulocytopenia, hallucination,
heartblock, hepatic coma, hypoglycemia, hypotension, impaired
concentration, increased LDH, jaundice, leukocytosis, leukopenia,
lymphadenopathy, manic reaction, mental deficiency, muscle weakness,
pancreatitis, paralysis, paranoia, postural hypotension,
pseudomembranous colitis, rhabdomyolysis, sleep disorders, speech
disorder, stupor, syncope, tachycardia, tendinitis, thrombocytopenia,
vertigo, weight decrease, WBC abnormal not otherwise specified.
In clinical trials using multiple-dose therapy, ophthalmologic
abnormalities, including cataracts and multiple punctate lenticular
opacities, have been noted in patients undergoing treatment with other
quinolones. The relationship of the drugs to these events is not
presently established.
Crystalluria and cylindruria have been reported with other
quinolones.(sic)
[Color perception disorders after nalidixic acid absorption]
[Article in French]
Haut J, Haye C, Legras M, Demailly P, Clay C.
PMID: 4540395 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Reversible visual loss in a patient receiving high-dose ciprofloxacin
hydrochloride (Cipro)
Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson
University, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
Bilateral acute visual loss characterized by cecocentral scotomas and
acquired dyschromatopsia developed in a patient receiving large oral
doses of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (Cipro). The visual defects
improved after cessation of this antibiotic. To our knowledge, this
association has not been described previously. The use of this
medication in high doses must be accompanied by careful monitoring of
optic nerve function.(sic)
The preceding is but a very brief synopsis of the damage resulting
from the careless scripting of these agents. You do a great disservice
to both the patient and the physician by failing to make note of the
real risk involved with fluoroquinolone therapy. I would hope that you
would take the time and effort to present such findings to avoid such
tragedies from being repeated in the future.
Within the AERS report summaries maintained by the FDA we find untold
reports of severe vision damage associated with fluoroquinolone
therapy including:
The author is correct that many questions regarding the newer
generations remain to be answered, but they all have to do with the
severe and non-abataing nature of the associated adverse reactions.
Respectfully submitted,
Director
Fluoroquinolnoe Toxocity Research Foundation
www.fqresearch.org
fqresearch@aol.com