BREAKING NEWS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS


The FQ Research Support Forum is back on line

Due to the continuing problem of numerous spam postings, which we believe to be deliberate in nature to disrupt the FQ Research Forum, we had decided to take the forum off line until this problem could be addressed.  These issues have been resolved and a new discussion forum has been added to the Yahoo Group Forums.

The Group home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fqtoxicity
The Group email address: fqtoxicity@yahoogroups.com


Torn Knee Cartilage requiring surgical repair in a Pediatric Patient, secondary to levaquin.
We report upon a 14 year old male who suffered ruptured cartilage in both knees secondary to levaquin
Click Here to Read More
 

The European Medicines Agency has recommended limiting the use of oral moxifloxacin
At its July 2008 meeting, the agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) concluded that the benefits of oral moxifloxacin medicines continued to outweigh its risks.
However, due to safety concerns, mainly related to an increased risk of adverse hepatic reactions, it recommended restricting their use in these indications.
(read more)


EMEA Restricts Use of Oral Norfloxacin Drugs in UTIs

LONDON -- July 24, 2008 -- The European Medicines Agency has
recommended restricting the use of oral norfloxacin-containing
medicines in urinary infections.
The Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)
has concluded that the marketing authorisations for oral norfloxacin-
containing medicines, when used in the treatment of acute or chronic
complicated pyelonephritis, should be withdrawn because the benefits
of these medicines do not outweigh their risks in this indication.

(read more)



LEVAQUIN PRODUCT LIABILITY
(read more)
 Currently there are 15 product liability cases filed in regards
 to the adverse drug reactions associated with levaquin.  A Judicial
 Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) granted Plaintiffs’ Motion
 To Centralize Individual And Class Action Lawsuits In District of
 Minnesota Over Objection of Defendants, J and J / Orhto McNeil


Liver damage linked to levofloxacin

The latest package insert for Levaquin (May 2008) now includes
NUMEROUS updated warnings concerning fatal liver
damage following levaquin therapy.
Click here to read more...

A powerful antibiotic used to treat pneumonia, urinary tract infections
and other ailments is suspected of causing diabetes like and liver
problems in dozens of Canadians, five of whom died.  As the department
tries to gauge the extent of the problem, doctors are being urged to
report any cases of blood-sugar level upset or liver damage that may
be linked to levofloxacin.

Health Canada received 22 reports of disturbed blood-sugar levels
between January, 1997, and June, 2006, attributed to levofloxacin.
Most were hypoglycemia, or dangerously low blood sugar.  Over
the same period, levofloxacin was suspected in five reports of liver
failure, nine of hepatitis and one of hepatorenal syndrome:
kidney failure linked to liver disease. There were another 29
reports of other liver related side effects linked to the drug.

Another drug in the same class, trovafloxacin, was pulled off the
market in the late 1990s because of liver adverse reactions.
And gatifloxacin is known to cause glycemic reactions.  Recent
Bayer issued a European "Dear Doctor" letter concerning similar
fatal liver damage regarding Avelox.
Original "Dear Doctor Letter" can be viewed by clicking here


Safety Review of the five pediatric trials relied upon by the FDA to grant an extension of pediatric exclusivity to Johnson and Johnson:

1st Study:  Of the 712 subjects evaluable for safety, 275 (52%) levofloxacin-treated subjects  experienced 1 or more adverse event.  Seventeen subjects had 23 adverse events of marked severity.  Twenty-three subjects experienced MS adverse events. Serious adverse events were reported in 33 (6%) levofloxacin-treated subjects.  Two serious adverse events in levofloxacin-treated subjects resulted in fatal outcomes.  Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 12 (2%).

2nd Study:   Of the 204 subjects evaluable for safety, 122 experienced 1 or more adverse events.  Twelve were marked in severity:  Twelve subjects (6%) discontinued study drug due to an adverse event.  Six subjects experienced a MS adverse event. There were no deaths. Seven subjects (3%) experienced 8 serious adverse events.

3rd Study:   Results of this study are not available even though they are required to be posted on the clinicaltrials.gov website within one year of completion. There is not conclusions posted on that site as of 3-26-2008

4th Study:  Results of this study will not be available for about 15-20 years. Patients who develop one or more musculoskeletal disorders during the first year will be monitored until they have completed puberty (15th birthday for females and 17th birthday for males).

5th Study:  Results of this study are not available even though they are required to be posted on the clinicaltrials.gov website within one year of completion. There is not conclusions posted on that site as of 3-26-2008. The results of this study have not been posted on clinicaltrials.gov as required by law. No results available to be posted as none can be found at this time, even though Federal Law requires that they be available through the clinicaltrials.gov website a through search failed to locate this study and the results thereto.

Click here to read more ...


New Drug Application for Garenoxacin DENIED due to lack of efficacy and safety concerns.

The application for marketing authorization for Garenoxacin mesylate was submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) on May 5, 2006. Schering-Plough Europe withdrew its marketing authorization application for Garenoxacin mesylate on July 26, 2007.  Believed to be the result of the letter of NON APPROVAL issued by the European Medicines Agency due to concerns regarding lack of efficacy as well as serious adverse reaction profile. 

Based on the CHMP review of the safety and efficacy data the the European Medicines Agency decided that the application for Garenoxacin 400 mg tablet was NOT approvable for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized patients, for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) or for uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (USSTI).  The application for Garenoxacin 600 mg tablet was NOT approvable for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (CSSTI) or for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) and acute pelvic infections. The application for Garenoxacin 2mg/ml solution for infusion was NOT approvable for the treatment of CAP, CSSTI, IAI or acute pelvic infections. The major objection precluding a recommendation for marketing authorization pertains to deficiencies on the efficacy demonstration as well as adverse drug reactions.

The major safety issue for garenoxacin appears to be drug-related hypotension.

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has been formally notified by Schering-Plough Europe of its decision to withdraw the application for a centralized marketing authorization for the medicinal product Garenoxacin mesylate 400 mg and 600 mg film-coated tablets and 2 mg/ml solution for infusion.

A New Drug Application concerning Garenoxacin was also filed with the FDA, which Schering-Plough had also subsequently withdrawn  Toyama had expected the agency to approve the antibiotic, clearing the way for the Japanese drug developer to start earning revenue on U.S. sales. Schering-Plough dropped this application stating that it did not have a sub-licensee for the U.S. market.  However we are of the opinion that for the same reasons cited by the European Medicines Agency (lack of efficacy and safety concerns) that the FDA would not have approved Garenoxacin and for this reason it was withdrawn, rather than the lack of a a sub-licensee cited by Schering-Plough

For further information:

Withdrawal assessment report for Garenoxac in Mesylate (garenoxacin)

Schering-Plough Europe withdraws its marketing authorisation application for Garenoxacin mesylate

http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/garenoxacinmesylate/H-747-WAR.pdf

http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/garenoxacinmesylate/34117407en.pdf


Supreme Court grants TOTAL immunity from civil litigation to the manufacturers of medical devices.

In a ruling decided February 20, 2008 in regards to patient's injuries.  In a decision expected this fall this same immunity will be granted to the various manufacturers of prescription drugs.  As a result of this ruling those who have been injured by defective devices or defective drugs will be BARRED from suing for their injuries provided the FDA approved their design and use.  Rendering the FDA now to be considered infallible.

Click here to read more about this travesty


PUBLIC CITIZEN SUES THE FDA OVER THE ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS OF THE FLUOROQUINOLONES

In response to the FDA refusing to even consider their petition seeking Black Box warnings as required by law, Public Citizen filed suit in Federal Court to require the FDA to obey the law.

Click here to read more about yet another total disregard for public safety by the FDA


DEAR DOCTOR LETTERS SENT REGARDING SEVERE ADRS TO AVELOX

FRANKFURT, Feb 14, 2008 (Reuters) - Bayer (BAYG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research) is sending letters warning doctors in Europe of rare incidents of severe liver and skin side effects in patients taking its Avelox antibiotic, the German drugs and chemicals group said on Thursday.

Bayer has included the additional warnings in the packaging of Avelox products since autumn last year after some incidents of severe side effects were monitored, but is now reinforcing this by writing to doctors.

"The side effects are very rare. But when it happens, it is quite severe to patients. We want doctors to be more aware," said Yvonne Moeller, a spokeswoman at Bayer.

Avelox, one of Bayer's top-selling drugs, saw sales of almost 400 million euros ($584.4 million) in 2006.

© Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

Original "Dear Doctor Letter" can be viewed by clicking here

This is a copy of the European Dear Doctor Letter

February 2008
IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS AND SAFETY MEASURES
Direct Healthcare Professional Communication regarding moxifloxacin (Avelox®) and serious hepatic and bullous skin reactions
Dear Healthcare Professional,
In agreement with EU regulatory authorities, including the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Bayer would like to inform you of important safety information. A recent assessment of adverse reactions associated with the use of moxifloxacin resulted in the following information and recommendations:
• Treatment with moxifloxacin is associated with a risk of developing fulminant hepatitis potentially leading to life threatening liver failure and risk of potentially life threatening bullous skin reactions like Stevens-Johnson-Syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
• Due to limited clinical data, moxifloxacin is contraindicated in patients with impaired liver function (Child Pugh C) and in patients with transaminases increased > 5 fold the upper limit of normal (ULN).
• Patients should be advised to stop treatment and to contact their physician if early signs and symptoms of these reactions occur.
• The product information has been appropriately updated.
• Healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reactions associated with the use of moxifloxacin.
Background
Moxifloxacin is known to impair liver function, and the product information was updated to include Stevens-Johnson-Syndrome (SJS) in 2002. A review of worldwide serious, including fatal, cases of both hepatotoxicity and bullous skin reactions such as SJS and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) reported for moxifloxacin was recently performed.
Safety Concern
The liver injuries possibly related to moxifloxacin were more frequently of cholestatic or mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic than of hepatocellular type. Onset of symptoms was usually between 3 and 10 days. Isolated cases of delayed hepatotoxic effects were also identified and usually occurred 5 to 30 days after cessation of moxifloxacin therapy. Eight reports of fatal hepatic injuries were considered as possibly related to moxifloxacin therapy. Cases of positive re-challenge gave further evidence of a causal relationship. However, the majority of patients experiencing serious liver injuries where the outcome was reported improved or recovered.
TEN was reported in several cases where a causal relationship was considered possible; this included two cases with fatal outcome. Additionally, a total of 35 individual cases of SJS were
reported, including three cases where there was a fatal outcome and seven cases which were considered life-threatening. In these 10 cases of severe SJS, a progression to TEN was documented in three patients.
Based on the large patient exposure, the incidence of both life threatening liver injuries and TEN is very low, although a definite frequency cannot be calculated from these reports.
As a consequence of this review, Bayer has revised the product information for moxifloxacin across the EU.
Recommendations to Healthcare Professionals
We would like to remind you that moxifloxacin is contraindicated in patients with impaired liver function (Child Pugh C) and in patients with transaminases increased > 5 fold ULN.
We would like to further remind you to be vigilant for the early signs and symptoms of severe liver injury and bullous skin reactions like SJS or TEN. Patients should be advised to stop treatment immediately and to contact a physician if relevant signs or symptoms occur, including rapidly developing asthenia associated with jaundice, dark urine, bleeding tendency and hepatic encephalopathy.
When prescribing moxifloxacin, consideration should be given to official guidance on the appropriate use of antibacterial agents which is especially relevant with regard to treatment of less severe infections.
Call for reporting
If you have observed similar cases, please report adverse reactions to the MHRA or to Bayer HealthCare.
Suspected adverse reactions should be reported directly to the MHRA via the Yellow Card Scheme (information can be found at Hwww.yellowcard.gov.ukH) or to Bayer HealthCare Drug Surveillance Department either by phone on 01635 563500, fax 01635 563703, by e-mail to Hphdsguk@bayer.co.ukH.
Communication information
If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact Bayer HealthCare Medical Information department on 01635 563116 or by e-mail at medical.science@bayer.co.uk.
Yours sincerely,
Medical Director
Bayer Schering Pharma, Bayer plc

Original "Dear Doctor Letter" can be viewed by clicking here

Additional information concerning this development click here


PRESS RELEASE  Jan. 3, 2008

Antibiotic Leads to Tendon Ruptures; FDA Ignores Risks

Public Citizen Sues FDA in Federal Court to Force Agency to Act On
Petition Seeking Stricter Fluoroquinolone Warnings

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Despite long-standing evidence that
fluoroquinolone antibiotics can cause tendon ruptures, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) has failed to increase its warnings to
patients and physicians about the dangers of the medicines, Public
Citizen told a federal court Thursday.

Public Citizen sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia, asking the court to force the FDA to act upon a petition
the consumer group filed with the agency 16 months ago. The FDA has
failed to respond to the petition, which asked the agency to put
a "black box" warning on fluoroquinolone antibiotics (such as Cipro,
Levaquin and others) to make doctors and patients more aware of the
risk of serious tendon injury before tendons actually rupture.

The petition also urged the FDA to send a warning letter to
physicians, as well as require an FDA-approved medication guide to be
dispensed when prescriptions are filled. Public Citizen contends that
the FDA is violating the Administrative Procedure Act by not acting
upon the petition.

Stronger warnings could lead to earlier intervention and prevent
needless injuries by allowing doctors to switch patients to other
antibiotics, said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen's
Health Research Group.

"While the FDA sits idly by and ignores the problem, more people
will suffer serious tendon ruptures that could have been prevented,"
Wolfe said. "The current warning is buried in a long list of possible
adverse reactions and is far too easy to miss."

From November 1997 through December 2005, the FDA received 262
reports of tendon ruptures, mainly of the Achilles tendon, 258 cases
of tendinitis and 274 cases of other tendon disorders in patients
using fluoroquinolone antibiotics. An additional 74 tendon ruptures
have subsequently been reported to the FDA for a total of 336.
Because only a small fraction of cases are typically reported to the
FDA, the actual number of ruptures and other tendon injuries
attributable to the antibiotic is much higher.
 


WASHINGTON - A consumer group sued the Food and Drug Administration Thursday, charging the agency is ignoring calls for stronger warnings that Cipro and similar antibiotics may cause serious tendon injuries.

Labels of the fluoroquinolone family of antibiotics — drugs that include the popular Cipro and Levaquin — already warn about rupture of tendons and other tendon injuries, but at the bottom of a list of other side effects.

The consumer group Public Citizen wants those warnings upgraded to the FDA's most severe type, a so-called black-box warning — and for patients to get pamphlets with every bottle that describe the risk. It argues that too few patients know they're supposed to quit using the drugs if they experience symptoms such as pain or inflammation, before the tendon actually ruptures.

Public Citizen filed a petition seeking the stronger warning in August 2006. The state of Illinois had filed a similar petition the previous year.

The FDA is violating its own statutes and putting patients at risk in taking so long to settle the issue, Public Citizen said in the suit filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

When Public Citizen first filed the petition, FDA's database showed 262 reports of tendon ruptures between November 1997 and December 2005, along with hundreds of other tendon problems in users of these antibiotics. Since then, the FDA has received an additional 74 reports of tendon ruptures, said Public Citizen's Dr. Sidney Wolfe. Only a fraction of drug side effects typically are reported to the agency, he noted.

An FDA spokesman said the agency was evaluating the lawsuit and declined comment.
 


Two new links have been added to the discussion forum referral list:

Antibiotics .org
Website dedicated to the adverse reactions of the fluoroquinolones

Quinolone_Survivors
A new discussion forum hosted by Yahoo


"Taken As Directed" now available on DVD.

Visitors may be interested in "Taken As Directed," a new documentary
film about drug side effects, with a focus on Lariam (mefloquine). Mefloquine is an antimalarial
drug and is a chemical "cousin" of the Fluoroquinolones. The adverse effects of
mefloquine are frighteningly similar to those of the fluoroquinolones
(except that Lariam doesn't cause spontaneous tendon rupture).

"Taken As Directed" profiles 5 once-healthy people who trusted the healthcare
system and took an FDA-approved drug to prevent them from getting malaria.
Mefloquine ruined their health and turned their lives upside down. Each of them
developed unexpected, long term adverse effects caused by the drug. Four of the 5
(including a teenager) suffered permanent brain damage (vestibular) from this
drug. One of them committed suicide. Lariam has been associated with severe
toxic psychosis.

Taken As Directed was edited and directed by an award-winning filmmaker, Jason Mullis,
Channel 3 Mediaworks.

Log unto www.takenasdirected.com to see a trailer and to purchase the DVD. The film is
not expected to be shown in theaters.

If you have questions about the film, you may email the Co-Producer, Jeanne Lese privately
at:
jlese@earthlink.net.

For questions about mefloquine, visit www.lariaminfo.org or email info@lariaminfo.org

Taken As Directed
Produced by Channel 3 Mediaworks

Distributed by Public Eye Productions
Director and editor, Jason Mullis

Producer, Sue Rose

Co-producer, Jeanne Lese


Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro: Suit Filed Against Bristol-Myers Squibb Over Tequin

Complaint alleges manufacturer failed to communicate the severe side effects of the popular drug
July 31, 2007: 05:53 PM EST


SEATTLE, July 31 /PRNewswire/ -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro filed a lawsuit today against Bristol-Myers Squibb and Schering Corporation , claiming its antibiotic drug Tequin causes severe blood-sugar issues in some patients which could lead to debilitating long-term healthcare issues including diabetes, and death.

Tequin and its generic equivalent gatifloxacin was commonly prescribed for sinus, lung, and urinary tract infections, as well as other illnesses.

According to Rob Carey, lead attorney from HBSS, safety concerns regarding Tequin began to surface in 2001, two years after the drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, when medical literature began suggesting a link between Tequin and dysglycemia among diabetics and non-diabetics.
"We plan to show the court that Bristol-Myers Squibb was aware of the risks at this time, but did little except change some aspects of labeling which we believe downplayed the risks dramatically," said Carey.

According to the complaint, Springfield, Missouri, resident Patrick Bills developed severe hyperglycemia and new onset diabetes while taking Tequin for a skin infection.
"We believe there is a direct connection between Pat's diabetes and his use of Tequin, a situation we are afraid is very common among Tequin users," Carey said.
The complaint states that pharmaceutical giant Bristol Myers-Squibb (BMS) knew or should have known that Tequin could cause severe blood sugar problems and diabetes in patients who took the drug.

Today's court action claims that the pharmaceutical company ignored mounting reports of diabetes-related problems until February 2006 when -- in conjunction with the FDA -- it added a warning to the label that diabetics should not take Tequin. However, the newly added warning label did not include any danger to non-diabetic patients, which the plaintiff was.

"Adding a warning label for diabetic patients, years after the drug's introduction does not address the serious concern of non-diabetic patients developing diabetes and falls seriously short of their responsibility to the public," said Carey.

According to the complaint Bills began taking Tequin in March of 2005. Less than a year later he began experiencing symptoms of hypoglycemia including extreme thirst, frequent urination, and vision changes. In late January of 2006 Bills was diagnosed with severe hyperglycemia and diabetes.

Before Bills began taking Tequin he was very healthy and active and had not exhibited any symptoms of either of the conditions he was diagnosed with in 2006, the complaint notes.  A Canadian study cited in the March 2006 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine found that Tequin users had 17 times greater risk of developing serious diabetes and four times greater risk of being hospitalized with low blood sugar complications than patients using other antibiotics.

On May 2, 2006, Bristol-Myers Squibb quietly announced to its shareholders that it would stop making and selling Tequin; however, drugs that were already in pharmacies and in doctor's offices throughout the country were still being prescribed and without adequate warning, the complaint states.
According to Carey, significant injury that could have been prevented had already occurred and BMS allowed that to continue as a direct result of the company's irresponsible negligence of the facts.

Common symptoms caused by abnormally low or high blood sugar include nervousness, dizziness, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, anxiety, passing out, and confusion. Blood sugar disorders have also been shown to cause low blood pressure that may result in heart attack or renal failure.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Southern District Court in New York, lists nine different counts against Bristol-Meyers Squib and Schering Corporation and seeks compensatory and punitive damages for Bills who was prescribed Tequin without receiving full disclosure of possible side effects.

For more information and to view the complaint, please visit http://www.hbsslaw.com.

About Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro

The law firm of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro is based in Seattle with offices in Chicago, Cambridge, Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Francisco. Since the firm's founding in 1993, it has developed a nationally recognized practice in class-action and complex litigation. Among recent successes, HBSS has negotiated a pending $300 million settlement as lead counsel in the DRAM memory antitrust litigation; a $340 million recovery on behalf of Enron employees which is awaiting distribution; a $150 million settlement involving charges of illegally inflated charges for the drug Lupron, and served as co-counsel on the Visa/Mastercard litigation which resulted in a $3 billion settlement, the largest anti-trust settlement to date. HBSS also served as counsel in a $850 million settlement in the Washington Public Power Supply litigation and represented Washington and 12 other states in lawsuits against the tobacco industry that resulted in the largest settlement in the history of litigation. For a complete listing of HBSS cases, visit http://www.hbsslaw.com.

CONTACT:

Robert Carey (602) 840-5900
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
Rob@hbsslaw.com

Mark Firmani (206) 443-9357
Firmani + Associates, Inc.
Mark@firmani.com


The CDC no longer recommends treating gonorrhea with fluoroquinolone antibiotics

April 12, 2007 -- The CDC announced today that it no longer recommends treating gonorrhea with
fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as Cipro, Floxin, and Levaquin. Instead, the CDC recommends only one
class of drugs -- the cephalosporins, which are antibiotics such as Rocephin -- for gonorrhea treatment.

The new data and gonorrhea treatment recommendations appear in CDC's Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report,  April 13, 2007; vol 56: pp 332-336.


Adverse reaction to Ciprofloxacin said to have destroyed three more lives

My husband’s name is Jason Garner and twelve years ago Ciprofloxacin changed our lives forever. My husband was convicted of second-degree murder and aggravated robbery and until 2004 we could never understand what it was that sparked this peculiar behavior. All him and I knew that it was not until after he got sick that his behavior changed.

In September of 1995 my husband murdered a good friend of his. He could not remember committing the crime unless he was having nightmares. When he was assigned a public defender we told him that my husband’s behavior did not change until he was diagnosed with a severe urinary tract infection. His attorney at that time said he had gone to the hospital and there was no record of my husband coming to the hospital. We proceeded to trial just knowing that this was an accident but no other explanation. The jury came back with guilty of second-degree murder and aggravated robbery and he was later sentenced to forty years at 100%. My husband made me promise to find out what really happened that day.

In 2004 I decided to go to the hospital my husband had gone to a couple of weeks before the crime. The record clerk told me that all I had to do was get my husband to sign a form releasing his medical records to me. So that’s what I did and I received his medical record three weeks later and took it to the local pharmacist and that’s how I was introduced to Ciprofloxacin. The pharmacist explained the side effects of Cipro and gave me a pamphlet as well to read. I have done extensive research for the past three years on the side effects of the drug.

My husband is still currently incarcerated at West Tennessee Penitentiary serving his forty years however he is on post conviction hoping his attorney was ineffective for failing to get the medical records. If there are any similar cases please email me at wheelsofjustice1235@hotmail.com or just anyone know anything that can be beneficial.

Marsha M Garner


Devaluing Life: Pfizer Charged for Human Testing

Monday, June 4, 2007

"Working for a healthier world" is the trademarked slogan for Pfizer Pharmaceutical Company, but Nigerian authorities, human rights groups, and the global media have provided evidence of Pfizer's actions to the contrary. In May of 2007, criminal charges as well as a $2 billion dollar civil lawsuit against Pfizer were filed on behalf of Kano, Nigeria, the country's largest state, for what many deem as a violation of international law and a complete disregard for human rights.

According to reports assembled by Nigerian government officials and a panel of Nigerian medical professionals, Pfizer conducted drug tests on 200 children in Kano during a meningitis outbreak that raged throughout West Africa in 1996. The children (including infants) were selected at random from the crowds of people stationed at an impromptu quarantine facility reserved for those suffering from the effects of the outbreak. The civil lawsuit indicates specifics of the testing, which included the administering of the experimental Pfizer drug Trovan* to one hundred children, and a "dangerously low dose of a comparison drug made by Hoffman-LaRoche," a Swiss pharmaceutical company, to the remaining half. The researchers involved in the testing had full knowledge that the medication had "life-threatening side-effects" and that it may have been "unfit for human use" at the time it was given to the children. Officials have demonstrated that Pfizer's actions yielded tragic results. All of the children used in the tests experienced life-altering side effects from the drugs. The children were left blind, deaf, paralyzed, brain-damaged, and others even died, leading the international community to question the validity of the response Pfizer issued regarding the pending criminal charges, in which they stated that, "Pfizer's doctors had solid scientific evidence that it would provide a safe and effective treatment against the deadly disease [meningitis]" and that they were engaged in "an effort that provided significant benefit to some of Nigeria's youngest citizens."

Additional allegations enumerated in the lawsuit, including a) that the parents of the children were not provided with accurate information regarding the testing or alternative treatments, b) the parents were not allowed to visit their children at the testing ward, c) that Pfizer never obtained the parents' consent to test on their children, and finally, d) that Pfizer fabricated documentation regarding the study itself have compelled Nigerians from all walks of life to take action. While members of the legal and political sectors seek to hold Pfizer accountable for their actions in order to obtain monetary coverage of the necessary resources to care for the severely disabled surviving children, civilians have called for the prosecution of Pfizer for more personal reasons. The use of impoverished, "Third World," children and/or oppressed peoples as human guinea pigs for the sake of scientific advancement is nothing new. Dangerous (often lethal) testing on humans is commonplace not only during war, but also in times of political and social unrest. In addition, poor communities around the world, including populations in Western nations, are often subjected to environmental injustice by way of laissez-faire government policies regarding the practices of waste management facilities, weapons testing sites, and factories that are placed adjacent to their neighborhoods.

This frequency of victimization leads many of those affected by such violence to harbor suspicion toward the government (in their respective nations as well as foreign), non-government organizations, volunteers, and healthcare professionals. Some parents in Kano, for example, feared that a polio immunization program initiated in Nigeria last year was yet another opportunity for Western drug companies to test on their children and refused to bring them to receive a basic shot. The unethical practices of resource providers such as Pfizer have permanently destroyed any remaining fragment of faith that populations in need may have had in organizations (corporate, governmental, or volunteer) that work to provide assistance for ongoing health issues in developing nations and lower-income communities.

As more details of this case are exposed, the world is reminded, little by little, that the lives of the economically and politically disadvantaged have little value in the eyes of companies that can only see the color green. More must be done to ensure not only that unethical medical practices are prosecuted, but that they do not continue in the future. It starts with us.

*Trovan is presently banned in the E.U. In 1997, it was cleared for adult use in the United States, but after reports that the Pfizer-produced antibiotic had led to liver damage and even death, the FDA allowed restricted use in limited circumstances.

-Wendi Muse


Pfizer issued the following statement in response to legal action taken against the company by the Nigerian government.

NEW YORK, NY, May 29, 2007 -

Pfizer continues to emphasize—in the strongest terms—that the 1996 Trovan clinical study was conducted with the full knowledge of the Nigerian government and in a responsible and ethical way consistent with the company's abiding commitment to patient safety. Any allegations in these lawsuits to the contrary are simply untrue—they weren't valid when they were first raised years ago and they're not valid today.

The Trovan study introduced a new meningitis treatment to the region that indisputably helped save the lives of almost 200 children stricken with meningococcal meningitis, a disease that—left untreated—kills four out of every 10 people who contract it. Pfizer always acted in the best interests of the children involved, using the best medical knowledge available.

At the time of the meningitis outbreak in Kano, Trovan was in late stage development. It had been evaluated in 5,000 patients and Pfizer's doctors had solid scientific evidence that it would provide a safe and effective treatment against the deadly disease. At a 94.4% survival rate, Trovan performed at least as well as the best treatment available.

For over 50 years, Pfizer has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to work with the government and people of Nigeria in support of programs that improve the health standards and accessibility to medical treatment in that country. Pfizer believes this partnership has been mutually beneficial in the past and will continue to be valuable in the future.

It is indeed regrettable that, more than a decade after the meningitis epidemic in Kano, the Nigerian government has taken legal action against Pfizer and others for an effort that provided significant benefit to some of Nigeria's youngest citizens.


Ciprofloxacin interacts with thyroid replacement therapy

BMJ, Apr 2005; 330: 1002 ; doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1002
The British Medical Journal Article/ Paper
John G Cooper, Knut Harboe, Sofia K Frost, and Řyvind Skadberg

We report two cases of unexplained hypothyroidism in patients taking oral ciprofloxacin.

In Patient #1 who had been stable on thyroid meds prior after Cipro Her thyroid stimulating hormone concentration had increased to 44 mIU/l (reference range 0.4-4.4 mIU/l), free thyroxine had fallen to 4 pmol/l (12-22 pmol/l), and free triiodothyronine was 1.0 pmol/l (3.1-6.3 pmol/l). Increasing levothyroxine to 200 µg daily had no effect. We reduced levothyroxine to 125 µg daily and stopped ciprofloxacin, and thyroid function tests rapidly became normal.

In Patient #2 She had maintained stable thyroid function tests on a daily dose of 150 µg levothyroxine. After three weeks' treatment with oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice a day), her concentration of thyroid stimulating hormone had increased from 1.6 to 19 mIU/l and free thyroxine had fallen from 22 to 13 pmol/l. Switching from concomitant administration of levothyroxine and ciprofloxacin to administering the drugs with a six hour gap resulted in rapid normalization of the thyroid function tests .

Oral ciprofloxacin may interact with levothyroxine if they are given together. The most plausible explanation is that ciprofloxacin decreases the absorption of levothyroxine. Antacids, laxatives, colestipol, colestyramine, ferrous sulphate, sulcralfate, and raloxifene have been reported to decrease the absorption of levothyroxine, but we have not found any previous reports of an interaction between levothyroxine and ciprofloxacin. Neither have the WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring nor the manufacturer of ciprofloxacin...


Publix Super Markets, located in Florida, to give out Ciprofloxacin to CHILDREN for FREE.

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Publix Super Markets, a privately held grocer,
said on Monday it would give away seven generic antibiotics most
often taken for childhood ailments such as strep throat.

The plan mimics one already in place at another private chain in
another part of the country. It also comes nearly a year after Wal-
Mart Stores Inc. and others started selling such drugs for $4 per
prescription.

Publix, which is based in Lakeland, Florida, said it would give out
amoxicillin, ampicillin, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin (excluding
ciprofloxacin XR), erythromycin (excluding Ery-Tab),
sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (or SMZ-TMP) and penicillin VK.
Customers must bring in a prescription to get up to a 14-day supply
for free.

Publix said those antibiotics account for nearly 50 percent of the
generic pediatric prescriptions filled at its stores. The company,
which has more than 900 stores in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South
Carolina and Tennessee, runs 684 pharmacies.

Meijer, a privately-held retailer with stores in the Midwest, started
giving away the same drugs in October.

The antibiotics that Publix and Meijer give away are not prescribed
for flu or any other viral disease, but are often given for
conditions such as strep throat and bronchitis.

In September, Wal-Mart started offering certain drugs for $4 per
prescription in Florida. The world's largest retailer then expanded
the plan across the country.

(Reporting by Jessica Wohl)


The latest numbers from the FDA

Levaquin Nov. 1997 - May 30, 2007
Total reactions: 39,128
Total death outcomes by case: 806
Total individual safety reports: 9,711

Floxin: Nov. 1997 - May 30, 2007
Total reactions: 13,495
Total death outcomes by case: 311
Total individual safety reports: 2,962

Cipro: Nov. 1997 - May 30, 2007
Total reactions: 40,395
Total death outcomes by case: 837
Total individual safety reports: 8,766

Proquin (ciprofloxacin) Nov. 1, 1997 - June 5, 2007
Total reactions: 40,151
Total death outcomes by case: 831
Total individual safety reports: 8,688

Tequin: Nov. 1997 - June 5, 2007
Total reactions: 15,494
Total death outcomes by case: 196
Total individual safety reports: 5,307

Factive: Nov. 1997 - June 5, 2007
Total reactions: 1,979
Total death outcomes by case: 7
Total individual safety reports: 1,108

Avelox: Nov. 1997 - June 5, 2007
Total reactions: 30,160
Total death outcomes by case: 337
Total individual safety reports: 7,391


On the lighter side of things:

Future Heads of the FDA